首页 > 题库 > 南开大学
选择学校
A B C D F G H J K L M N Q S T W X Y Z

Green means healthy outside of hospitals, too. Office workers with nature views are more (1 )about their jobs, less frustrated, in better health and more satisfied with their (2 ) , according to one study. According to another, prison inmates whose cells looked out on farm fields needed far less health care than those whose cells faced a (3 ) internal courtyard. Psychologists have found that exposure (4 ) trees, streams and other natural features improves concentration, creativity and emotional functioning. In one study. Frances Kuo, PhD, a psychologist who (5 ) the Landscape and Human Health Laboratory at the University of Illinois, and her colleagues showed that 20-minute walks across leafy city parks eases ADHD (6 ) in kids. A few years ago, Kuo and her research partners tested children in a high-rise Chicago public-housing project to see if a view of nature from their apartments helped them psychologically. (7 ) with girls who looked out on brick and asphalt, girls who saw trees from their windows concentrated better, acted less (8 ) and were more able to delay gratification. That (9 ) better self-discipline, Kuo says, which could help girls better handle the (10  ) that come their way as they grow up in the projects. The Illinois researchers also showed that areas of the public-housing project with trees and grass had lower levels of crime, (11  ) violence, noise, litter and graffiti (涂鸦). “When you put all these things together, it’s a picture of a healthier neighborhood,” Kuo say. Greener neighborhoods may even improve the (12  ) physical health of their residents. Dutch scientists cross checked the self-reported health of 10, 000 people with the greenness of their neighborhoods. After (13  ) for their income, age and other factors that affect health, they found that people in greener neighborhoods were healthier. In another study, elderly Tokyo residents were significantly more likely to survive (14  ) another five years if their neighborhood (15  )walkable parks and tree-lined streets.

查看试题

Extraordinary creative activity has been characterized as revolutionary, flying in the face of what is established and producing not what is acceptable but what will become accepted. According to this formulation, highly creative activity transcends the limits of an existing form and establishes a new principle of organization. However, the idea that extraordinary creativity transcends established limits is misleading when it is applied to the arts, even though it may be valid for the sciences. Differences between highly creative art and highly creative science arise in part from a difference in their goals. For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act. Innovative science produces new propositions in terms of which diverse phenomena can be related to one another in more coherent ways. Such phenomena as a brilliant diamond or a nesting bird are relegated to the role of data, serving as the means for formulating or testing a new theory. The goal of highly creative art is very different: the phenomenon itself becomes the direct product of the creative act. Shakespeare’s Hamlet is not a tract about the behavior of indecisive princes or the uses of political power, nor is Picasso’s painting Guernica primarily a prepositional statement about the Spanish Civil War or the evils of fascism. What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular. Aesthetic particulars produced by the highly creative artist extend or exploit, in an innovative way, the limits of an existing form, rather than transcend that form.This is not to deny that a highly creative artist sometimes established a new principle of organization in the history of an artistic field, the composer Monteverdi, who created music of the highest aesthetic value, comes to mind. More generally, however, whether or not a composition establishes a new principle in the history of music has little bearing on its aesthetic worth. Because they embody a new principle of organization, some musical works, such as the opera of the Florentine Camerata, are of signal historical importance, but few listeners or musicologists would include these among the great works of music. On the other hand, Mozart’s The Marriage of Figaro is surely among the masterpieces of music even though its modest innovations are confined to extending existing means. It has been said of Beethoven that he toppled the rules and freed music from the stifling confines of convention. But a close study of his compositions reveals that Beethoven overturned no fundamental rules. Rather, he was an incomparable strategist who exploited limits—the rules, forms, and conventions that he inherited from predecessors such as Haydn and Mozart, Handel and Bach—in strikingly original ways.1.The author considers a new theory that coherently relates diverse phenomena to one another to be the ( ) .2.The author implies that Beethoven’s music was strikingly original because Beethoven ( ) .3.The passage states that the operas of the Florentine Camerata are ( ) .4.The author regards the idea that all highly creative artistic activity transcends limits with ( ) .5.The author implies that an innovative scientific contribution is one that ( ) .

查看试题

暂未登录

成为学员

学员用户尊享特权

老师批改作业做题助教答疑 学员专用题库高频考点梳理

本模块为学员专用
学员专享优势
老师批改作业 做题助教答疑
学员专用题库 高频考点梳理
成为学员